When talking to companies about their engineering data I often hear the following words: "We manage our data via windows". When asked how they manage their data via windows they mean that there is a folder structure on the server that data is stored in. As an engineer, this is not managing the data - this is only storing data.
I've been working with Product Data Management (PDM) systems for over 10 years and struggle to come up with a justification for not using a PDM system to manage your data; windows just isn't up to the task.
Example: If you have a CAD design saved on a server you are going to come across a number of key issues. Here are the main issues I see with managing data this way, though there are many more:
There are many PDM solutions on the market at different price points and levels of functionality. Autodesk, for example, have 4 main products; Vault Basic, Vault Workgroup, Vault Professional and Vault Office.
Personally I find that many companies see the benefits of using these systems however often start with the cheapest option; in this case Vault Basic, Why? Because its included with the Autodesk Inventor software that they already run. I find I often need to challenge their reasons for moving to a basic system. Why? Because although many of the pain points above would be addressed, not all of them are. The needs of the design team are not fully met leading to workarounds and increases in workflows and manual work, this introduces mistakes.
So is this the right product and reason? Well, there are several key areas that any PDM system needs to address:
Vault Basic certainly covers these points but at the same time doesn't have all the functionality that a design team requires. As an engineer there are 2 key properties of any data that I need to know .... The state of the document and the revision.
Without this information, how can we effectively manage the design? This is in particular importance if you get audited by your customers! Yes, the product is included with Inventor, but when we are talking about managing the designs, states and revisions for a company; any small mistakes in your processes add-up quickly and become costly. With products such as Vault Workgroup and Naviate the initial investment is higher, however the reduction in processes and the automatic revision of documents based on the managed state of the data mean that engineers have clear access to the data and can manage the flow of the data through the company much easier. The result is that mistakes are significantly reduced in a manor that will pass any audit.
I would suggest to any company looking to implement a PDM system to think about their requirements from these systems and what meeting those requirements would mean for their company in terms of reductions in time, mistakes and cost. I believe that you will find in every case that the benefits to a company more than outweigh the investment required.
As cybersecurity threats continue to evolve, some of the biggest risks to your organisation might not be obvious. In this month’s IT Bulletin, we shine a light on three critical security concerns that are often underestimated or overlooked entirely. These issues can silently compromise systems, leak data, or be exploited without detection.
The latest updates to Factory Design 2026 bring powerful improvements to connector class creation, workflow efficiency, and overall performance. From a brand-new Connector Class dialogue to enhanced 4K compatibility and stability upgrades, these changes are designed to make your design process faster, smoother, and more intuitive.
Efficiency, accuracy, and innovation are crucial for staying competitive in the industrial landscape of today. Manufacturing and engineering companies face increasing challenges in managing product development, ensuring design accuracy, and optimising workflows. That’s where Computer-Aided Design (CAD) and Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) come into play.